Beth Raboin
CEO & Founder | GMVA
Imagine a patient showing up for a scheduled procedure, only to find that their prior authorization is still in limbo. Meanwhile, another patient is trying to reschedule an appointment but can’t seem to get through to the access team. On top of that, a denied claim is just sitting there in a work queue, untouched, because the revenue cycle team is already swamped with hundreds of other accounts.
In the midst of all this, nurses, physicians, supervisors, and department leaders are stepping up to help out wherever they can. They’re making calls, chasing down documentation, checking payer portals, sorting out scheduling issues, and assisting administrative teams who are grappling with ever-growing backlogs.
When the flow of administrative work starts to outpace an organization’s ability to handle it, the consequences ripple out beyond the back office. Patients end up waiting longer, revenue gets delayed, and employees find themselves taking on tasks that really shouldn’t be on their plates. Leaders are left managing queues and vacancies instead of focusing on improving operations.
For hospital executives, the question has shifted from simply asking, “How do we fill these open positions?” to a more pressing one:
"Does our organization have the administrative capacity to keep up with the level of care we’re providing?"
This distinction is crucial because ongoing staffing shortages across healthcare are making it harder to rely solely on traditional hiring to solve capacity gaps.
In this article, we discuss these bottlenecks, the data behind them, and what you can do to improve your hospital’s overall workflow.
Why Administrative Bottlenecks Matter More Than They Appear
Healthcare operations are all about connections. When there's a hiccup in one part of the patient journey, it rarely stays contained.
Take prior authorization, for example.
If that authorization isn’t wrapped up on time, a procedure might have to be pushed back. This means the patient access team will have to juggle rescheduling the appointment. Clinical staff might find themselves tangled up in extra paperwork or communicating with payers. Meanwhile, the financial clearance teams are left tracking the case. If a service goes ahead without the necessary authorization, the revenue cycle team could end up dealing with a denial or an appeal later on.
What started as one administrative snag has now created extra work for multiple departments.
You can see this same domino effect with eligibility verification, referral coordination, scheduling, registration, documentation, coding, billing, collections, denials, and accounts receivable follow-up.
That’s why we can’t just measure healthcare operational efficiency by how fast one employee checks off their tasks.
Leadership needs to look at how work flows throughout the entire organization.
When the administrative capacity doesn’t align with the workload, hospitals start to build up operational debt. Tasks pile up in queues. Exceptions become more frequent. Follow-ups get delayed. Employees end up spending more time fixing issues instead of preventing them in the first place.
In the end, what started as an administrative issue can spiral into a problem for patient care, revenue, and even the workforce.
Administrative Work Can Become a Clinical Barrier
Prior authorization is a prime example of how administrative capacity can really impact patient care.
According to the American Medical Association's 2025 Prior Authorization Physician Survey, which came out in 2026, a staggering 95% of physicians believe that prior authorization delays patients from getting the care they need. Additionally, 92% feel it has a negative effect on clinical outcomes, and 79% have seen patients give up on treatment due to authorization hurdles. Alarmingly, over a quarter of physicians—26%—reported that prior authorization has led to a serious adverse event.
The same survey revealed that physicians and their teams spend an average of 13 hours each week dealing with prior authorization, with 40% of them hiring staff solely for this purpose.
These statistics highlight why improving the prior authorization process should be a priority that extends beyond the utilization management department
When administrative teams are stretched thin, clinicians often find themselves stepping in to fill the gaps.
They respond to messages that could have been handled by administrative staff. They take part in extra calls with payers. They help track down missing information. Nurses might end up spending time chasing down documentation instead of focusing on their core responsibilities.
The problem isn’t that these tasks aren’t important; many of them are crucial.
The real issue lies in who is doing them, how smoothly they flow through the organization, and whether the hospital has enough trained administrative staff to handle them consistently.
Having strong support for patient access and authorization can play a vital role in clinical care: it helps safeguard the time of healthcare professionals while minimizing unnecessary obstacles in the patient’s journey.
How Administrative Backlogs Affect Hospital Revenue
Administrative bottlenecks can significantly affect how quickly—and even if—hospitals manage to collect the revenue they’ve earned.
According to a report from the American Hospital Association in 2026, hospitals spent an estimated $43 billion $43 billion in 2025 just to collect payments from insurers for care they had already provided. Out of that, nearly $18 billion was spent specifically on trying to overturn claims denials.
The same analysis from the AHA found that, on average, a hospital had about 64 administrative and billing staff members focused on insurer-related tasks in 2024, which accounted for roughly 6.5% of the total hospital workforce.
For those at the helm of hospitals, this highlights that administrative capacity is a key issue for financial performance.
Revenue leakage doesn’t always stem from a lack of clinical demand. Sometimes, the services have already been delivered, but the administrative systems in place to turn that service into actual revenue just can’t keep up.
This can occur when:
-
-
Eligibility isn’t verified in a timely manner.
-
Authorizations are incomplete.
-
There are errors in registration information.
-
Claims need extra documentation.
-
Denials aren’t addressed quickly.
-
Follow-ups on accounts receivable lag behind.
-
High-volume queues consistently outstrip available staffing.
-
This is where the right revenue cycle staffing solutions can make a measurable difference.
Letting queues grow unchecked can lead to a much bigger problem down the line. Aging accounts become tougher to resolve, employees end up spending more time digging into exceptions, and cash flow becomes less predictable. In response, leaders might resort to overtime, temporary staffing, extra recruiting, or emergency backlog projects.
A smarter approach is to build up enough capacity before the usual workload spirals into a financial crisis.
How Administrative Overload Contributes to Healthcare Burnout
Administrative bottlenecks can have a ripple effect on employees who might not even show up on an administrative staffing report.
A comprehensive study conducted at a large hospital, published in Academic Medicine, revealed that physicians dedicate an average of 24% of their working hours to administrative tasks. Alarmingly, two-thirds of them reported that these responsibilities hindered their ability to provide high-quality patient care . The heavier the administrative load, the more it seemed to correlate with lower job satisfaction and increased burnout.
Recent studies published in PubMed continue to highlight the toll that administrative work and the demands of electronic medical records (EMR) take on healthcare professionals. A 2026 study focusing on emergency physicians found that spending more time on EMR-related tasks was linked to heightened emotional exhaustion and feelings of depersonalization.
This distinction is crucial for healthcare leaders to understand.
Burnout isn’t just about the sheer number of hours worked; it’s also about how those hours are utilized.
When a nurse finds themselves repeatedly handling administrative follow-ups because another department is overwhelmed, they’re not just “pitching in.”
Similarly, a supervisor who is constantly shifting workloads around due to unfilled positions isn’t merely managing; they’re navigating a challenging situation.
And for a revenue cycle employee facing a backlog that seems to grow faster than it can be managed, it’s not just a temporary busy spell if that imbalance has persisted for months.
Over time, these conditions can significantly alter the employee experience. People start to doubt whether they’ll ever be able to catch up.
High-performing employees often become the go-to solution for every backlog, while managers find themselves spending more and more time on hiring, training, scheduling overtime, and reallocating tasks.
That’s why optimizing the healthcare workforce should prioritize capacity and role design, rather than just focusing on headcount.
Hospital Workforce Shortages Make the Capacity Problem More Urgent
Traditional hiring is still a cornerstone of healthcare. Hospitals will always rely on strong internal teams to function effectively.
However, hiring alone can't be the only strategy for boosting capacity.
The American Hospital Association's 2025 Cost of Caring report reveals that labor made up a staggering 56% of hospital expenses in 2024, totaling around $890 billion. The AHA has consistently pointed out that workforce shortages are a significant strain on hospitals.
This creates a tricky situation. Hospitals need greater capacity, yet traditional labor costs are already their biggest expense. Hiring takes time, and high turnover rates lead to more recruiting and training demands, all while the administrative workload continues, regardless of whether positions are filled or not.
For executives looking to cut healthcare labor costs, the goal shouldn't just be about reducing headcount.
Instead, the focus should be on optimizing how labor is utilized.
Clinical staff should be able to dedicate more time to patient care. Specialized revenue cycle employees should engage in tasks that truly require their skills. Managers ought to concentrate on enhancing performance rather than constantly filling staffing gaps.
Of course, administrative tasks still need to be completed.
The real question is whether every new administrative demand necessitates hiring another full-time employee.
More and more, the answer is no.
Administrative Capacity Is Healthcare Capacity
Hospitals cannot separate administrative performance from clinical and financial performance.
When patients struggle to get scheduled, verified, authorized, registered, billed, or supported in a timely manner, that operational hiccup eventually makes its way to the bedside.
If the revenue cycle is bogged down with long queues, cash flow takes a hit.
When clinicians and managers are constantly picking up the slack from administrative vacancies and backlogs, it can really take a toll on morale.
And when all these issues hit at once, hiring another employee feels less like a strategic move and more like a knee-jerk reaction to an already overwhelmed system.
Healthcare leaders need a better solution.
A workforce infrastructure partnership offers hospitals a way to enhance their administrative capacity right where it’s needed, boosting healthcare capacity management, improving operational efficiency, and strengthening the existing teams.
GMVA provides hospitals and health systems with dedicated administrative capacity across patient access, authorization management, financial clearance, and revenue cycle operations, without requiring every increase in workload to become another internal hire.
The aim is simple:
Keep the administrative tasks flowing so your team can concentrate on what truly matters.
If you’re interested in how a workforce infrastructure partnership could benefit your hospital or health system, schedule a call with GMVA or check out more details at GMVA.com.
